ok these were done to help out the asset awards webpage committee. The graphic to the left uses a snippet of the ‘official’ graphics, the roulette wheel. Of course, I added the text to the wheel, plus did a bit of layout + design. Anyhow, I really like the on on the far right. I know it doesn’t go with the official graphics so much, but it’s definitely the one I like best. Oh, and the theme is ‘vegas’ in case you didn’t figure it out. Not sure why.
What an excellent project, Robin!
You may not need crits but I decided to go through projects on your STUDIO website and give my crits to folks who’s done great job.
It is very artistic and beautiful all around. I know you are kind of tired of hearing compliments by now…so here are a few minor crits.
Overall, I found it somewhat difficult to see the menus and navigate. I think it is because font sizes are too small and/or not eye-catching enough in comparison to everything else on a page.
On the main navigation, I literally had to roll the mouse over to see what it says…maybe it’s my eye sight.
I don’t know the whole purpose of this website…you can tell I didn’t read your project management site. But it would be great if you provide some sort of introduction on what it’s about on the main page or somewhere obvious. I was confused and still am somewhat wondering what it is about.
On the “art slideshow” page, “main page” link disappears from the main navigation bar.
I really liked the way you did the slideshow! Brilliant!
On the “about the artists” page, on the bottom…there are some blocks of purple bars or blocks or whatever you call it laying there… I just wasn’t sure what they were about. It seems like decoration…but nowhere else has them.
About the main navigation, I know you used CSS for it…it would be better if I can tell which page I currently am by just looking at the main navigation bar or somewhere. I was confused where I am.
These are all nit-picky things and I loved your project! You are very creative.
As is always the case with pretty much anything you create, your Web site is stunning!
I like the look and feel very much. A meta site, it both is art and is about art! It’s very
warm and inviting, which is not always the case for something with so much style!
When I looked at your site during the studio showcase trial run on the 17th of November,
I suggested that you change the style of the text on the “Thoughts on Creativity” section.
You have now done that and it is much easier to read while still looking very cool.
I particularly like the way you have done navigation for that section. I do think it would
be nice if you added some sort of “back to top” link and I think you could do that at the
same point as each of your internal navigation sections without throwing things off
I have a couple of suggestions for the artist info section.
- Begin with artist’s full name. I noticed Rene’s last name was not given. Perhaps put the name in bold to make it stand out a bit more.
- List your live interview participants alphabetically as you have done with your thoughts participants.
I also have some comments on the artist interviews and demos section.
You have a lot of dead space on this page. With the current image size, it would be possible to put the content in a table with two columns. Or, you could just add something fun to look at next to the info sections. But I am not loving the empty space in the tan box.
However, I do really love most everything else about your site. Thank you for creating
this valuable and interesting resource!
Wow! Your visual appeal is out the roof!
Suggestions: “examples of artwork, hear and read thoughts of artists, see artists creating art, and add your own thoughts on creativity. What is creativity? Will this project will spark your interest in arts and creativity?” – period after artwork. Hear and read….. take second will out of last sentence.on Project Info
there does seem to be some common threads there does seem to be some common threads – change does to do
I can’t see the “i” in relfection in the header.
I only wish I knew how to do half what you have done! Very impressive.
These are desk crits that came in while I was sick, so I am just adding them now.-------------------Hi, Robin:I like your website. The color is so strong and powerful. The design is neat! Only three small question/suggestion:
- The slide show you makes on the art examples page has a small problem to me. The play button seems can not work. It is supposed to play the slides automatically, right?
- On the end of “Thoughts on creativity”, you may want to put a button to help audience go back to the top/menu of the page. Just like the button you make at the end of each section.
- After I click “Add your thoughts”, I don’t know how to come back to your project. Maybe you could pop-up a new window for the blogger, or use frames to put the blogger in your website.
Hope it is helpful. Yi-Wen Tan
I’m not sure how many people come into the IDD program with an arts related background (actually my background is kind of all over the map, but it does contain some art studio experience) so I thought it might be interesting for me (and any others for that matter) to reflect on the studio experience in comparison with an art studio experience. I will say that there are some distinct similiarities and some differences…
- Both are self learning experiences under the direction of an instructor. The instructor may give guidance, but a majority of the work is done independently.
- Both have a critical review process by peers, IDD studio in written desk crits, and arts studio in critique, which is generally a verbal format. I think one of the challenges in both is that people really do not know how to critique. Doing it well is a very hard skill to learn. It’s neither about being overly cruel (ripping something to shreds without justification) or conversely, singing its praises. Also, it’s not necessarily just about pointing out small technical imperfections, but should look at the work in its entirety. I know that I struggle with critique (and desk crits, for that matter) but it is a good part of the process. One difference between desk crits and art critique is that it is usually a group (or in many cases the whole class) who look at the work. I do think there are good ideas that arise out of a group critique which would not normally come out in individual discussion.
- At an undergraduate level, the arts studio classes are at a much more instructional and technical level: students are assigned general things to do (such as drawing from a life model) which is in some ways similiar to the exercises and proficiency check that 6190 first timers do. At a graduate level, students have much more freedom to choose their tools and medium, as well as the content of their works.
- Both IDD studio & arts classes work toward an end goal: either submission of a portfolio, a final exhibit, or in the case of IDD, the showcase.
- One difference between arts studio and IDD studio is
I came around during Reiber’s class and looked at your website. I think it looks awesome. I am really impressed with the artwork that you and the other artists have created. I like this site because I am so far from being artistic that I can appreciate when other people are artistic. I like the interviews with the artists. I think that you might could add the time of each interview next to their picture. Some of the interviews were longer than I thought. I couldn’t get the drek davis drawing clip to come up. The drawing clip of you was incredible. The blog was a nice touch. I like the fact that you made an interactive website where others could be an addition to what you have researched thus far. I am sorry that my crit is not more critical but it looks fabulous. Congratulations, Kristen